The Asset Protection Law Center

A complete reference source on offshore trusts, family limited partnerships,
limited liability companies and advanced asset protection strategies.


Home About Our Firm Services Online Proposals Contact Info Recent Developments Q & A
 Asset Protection Law Library
 Litigation Trend
 Asset Protection Privacy
 Business Protection
 Family Limited Partnership
 Overview
 Partnership Types:
     General Partnership
     Limited Partnerships
 Tax Treatment of Partnerships
 Lawsuit Protection
 Creditor Protection
 Charging Order Remedy
 Who Should Own the FLP
     Ownership by Spouses
     Ownership by Children
     Ownership by a Trust
 The Uniform Partnership Act
 Income Tax Benefits
     Case Example
 Estate Tax Benefits
     Example
 Following FLP Formalities
 Creating the FLP
 The Partnership Agreement
 Funding the Partnership:
     Overview
     Dangerous Assets
     Safe Assets
     Bank and Brokerage Accounts
     Interest in Other Entities
          Case Example
 Summary
 Limited Liability Company
 Types of Trusts
 Revocable Living Trust
 Delaware Trust
 The APT or Offshore Trust
 Offshore Havens
 Equity Stripping
 Asset Protection Planning
 Link Directory
The Family Limited Partnership > Estate Tax Benefits > Example

Example

For example, the Smith family owns a business with a current value of $3 million, a rental property with equity of $1 million and retirement savings in stocks and bonds equal to $1 million. That's a total estate of $5 million. Under current law, with a properly designed estate plan, taking maximum advantage of the combined current exemption of $2 million, the estate tax on the balance of $3 million might be approximately $1.5m (Depending on the date of death and the amount of the credit at that time). Mr. and Mrs. Smith would like to take steps to preserve the family estate for the benefit of their three children, but they do not wish to give up control over their assets during their lifetime.

One solution to the problem involves a properly structured estate plan including an FLP that is established to hold all family assets. Mr. and Mrs. Smith would be the general partners of the FLP. As such they would have management and control over their property in the FLP. Initially, they could make a gift of the limited partnership interests to their children in an amount equal in value to the combined maximum estate tax credit (currently $2 million). In subsequent years, they could gift limited partnership interests equal to the amount of the annual gift tax exclusion of $22,000 per child ($66,000 per year).

Under this approach, in roughly forty-five years, the Smiths would be able to eliminate potential estate taxes and could preserve $5 million of family wealth (plus much future appreciation). At the same time that the Smiths are accomplishing this result, they would not relinquish significant control or authority over their real estate or their retirement savings. The forty-five year period makes it unlikely, however that the Smith's would complete this planning. That's more forethought than most people will exercise.

We can accelerate the advantages a great deal further by utilizing IRS rulings and court cases which hold that the value of each gift of a limited partnership interest must be discounted in order to account for the lack of marketability and the lack of control associated with those interests. For example, if the parents transfer assets with a value of $5 million to an FLP, a gift of a 1 percent limited partnership interest should not be valued at $50,000. Instead, because the interest cannot be readily sold and because the donee has no right to participate in management of the FLP, a reasonable approach to determine value, suggested by many financial advisors, would be to discount the transferred interest to reflect its true value in the market. Discounts in the range of 30 percent are fairly conservative, but some aggressive advisors push this number to the 50 percent range.

Once this discount is taken into consideration, potential tax savings can be accelerated. Using an aggressive discount, the value of the limited partnership interests transferred in the Smith FLP would be discounted in value from e.g. $5 million to $3 million. Significant value could be gifted in the first year without exceeding the credit of $2 million. That creates an immediate reduction in estate tax liability of $1 million. Over the remaining years additional interests are transferred to the children, further reducing the size of the parents' estate and the amount of the estate tax liability. And this all occurs in a relatively painless fashion. The Smiths have eliminated $1 million or more of estate taxes while maintaining control over their assets. If a less aggressive discount is chosen, the immediate and long-term savings are still substantial.

As an added bonus, this approach will also remove future appreciation from the Smiths' estate. In our example, all assets have a value today of $5 million. Increasing in value at a rate of just 5 percent per year, these assets would be worth an additional $3 million plus in just ten years. That's another $1.5 million in estate taxes that the Smiths have avoided by the use of the FLP strategy. If you own real estate or a business, which you believe will increase in value over the years, the FLP provides an excellent planning opportunity to achieve meaningful estate tax savings.


< back | next >
Complimentary Book

By Robert J. Mintz (256 pages. Copyright 2003). The most powerful and creative asset protection strategies - with up-to-date legal developments - the latest planning techniques, case law, articles, illustrations and examples. Essential reading for every professional, business owner and potential deep-pocket lawsuit defendant. A $14.95 value on Amazon.

Testimonials, Read What Others Are Saying About the Book.

Read it Online

or

Order Now

at no charge

New! Legal Guide for
2004
”Legal Guide to Asset Protection Planning” by Robert J. Mintz. A clear and concise guide for choosing and developing the correct plan.

Read it Online
Additional Topics

Other Books Available By Robert J. Mintz

New! Interview With Robert J. Mintz

Business Week Article

New Comments on the Anderson Case

Home | About Our Firm | Services | Online Proposals | Contact Information | Recent Developments | Q & A | Send E-mail

Disclaimer:

The information provided on this site is provided for illustration purposes only and does not represent a proposal or specific recommendation. As a word of caution, the information presented cannot possibly substitute for competent legal advice. Our treatment of the law is general and is not intended as a comprehensive discussion of all relevant issues. The law in each state will vary to some extent, and the applicability of the law will depend upon your individual circumstances. If you have a particular question about the information presented, you can telephone us at (800) 223-4291 and we will try our best to help you.

Copyright 1996 - 2003, Robert J. Mintz, All Rights Reserved.

No part of this site or its content may be reproduced in any form or by electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the copyright holder.