The Asset Protection Law Center

A complete reference source on offshore trusts, family limited partnerships,
limited liability companies and advanced asset protection strategies.


Home About Our Firm Services Online Proposals Contact Info Recent Developments Q & A
 Asset Protection Law Library
 Litigation Trend
 Asset Protection Privacy
 Business Protection
 Family Limited Partnership
 Overview
 Partnership Types:
     General Partnership
     Limited Partnerships
 Tax Treatment of Partnerships
 Lawsuit Protection
 Creditor Protection
 Charging Order Remedy
 The Uniform Partnership Act
 Income Tax Benefits
     Case Example
 Estate Tax Benefits
     Example
 Following FLP Formalities
 Creating the FLP
 The Partnership Agreement
 Funding the Partnership:
     Overview
     Dangerous Assets
     Safe Assets
     Bank and Brokerage Accounts
     Interest in Other Entities
          Case Example
 Summary
 Limited Liability Company
 Types of Trusts
 Revocable Living Trust
 Delaware Trust
 The APT or Offshore Trust
 Offshore Havens
 Equity Stripping
 Asset Protection Planning
 Link Directory
The Family Limited Partnership > Charging Order Remedy

Charging Order Remedy

If a judgment creditor cannot reach partnership assets, what can he do? Since Husband’s only asset is an interest in the FLP, the creditor would apply to the court for a charging order against Husband’s partnership interest. A charging order means that the general partner is directed to pay over to the judgment creditor any distributions from the partnership which would otherwise go the debtor partner, until the judgment is paid in full. In other words, money which comes out of the partnership to the debtor partner can be seized by the creditor until the amount of the judgment is satisfied. Cash distributions paid to Husband could, therefore, be taken by the creditor. A charging order does not give the creditor the right to become a partner in the partnership and does not give him any right to interfere in the management or control of partnership affairs. He only receives the right to any actual distributions paid to Husband.

Under the circumstances in which a creditor has obtained a charging order, the partnership would not make any distributions to the debtor partner. This arrangement would be provided for in the partnership agreement and is permissible under partnership law. If the partnership does not make any distributions, the judgment creditor will not receive any payments. The partnership simply retains all of its funds and continues to invest and reinvest its cash without making any distributions.

The result of this technique is that family assets have been successfully protected from the judgment against Husband. Had the FLP arrangement not been used and had Husband and Wife kept all of their assets in their own names, the judgment creditor would have seized everything. Instead, through the use of this technique, all of these assets were protected.


< back | next >
Complimentary Book

By Robert J. Mintz (256 pages. Copyright 2003). The most powerful and creative asset protection strategies - with up-to-date legal developments - the latest planning techniques, case law, articles, illustrations and examples. Essential reading for every professional, business owner and potential deep-pocket lawsuit defendant. A $14.95 value on Amazon.

Testimonials, Read What Others Are Saying About the Book.

Read it Online

or

Order Now

at no charge

New! Legal Guide for
2004
”Legal Guide to Asset Protection Planning” by Robert J. Mintz. A clear and concise guide for choosing and developing the correct plan.

Read it Online
Additional Topics

Other Books Available By Robert J. Mintz

New! Interview With Robert J. Mintz

Business Week Article

New Comments on the Anderson Case

Home | About Our Firm | Services | Online Proposals | Contact Information | Recent Developments | Q & A | Send E-mail

Disclaimer:

The information provided on this site is provided for illustration purposes only and does not represent a proposal or specific recommendation. As a word of caution, the information presented cannot possibly substitute for competent legal advice. Our treatment of the law is general and is not intended as a comprehensive discussion of all relevant issues. The law in each state will vary to some extent, and the applicability of the law will depend upon your individual circumstances. If you have a particular question about the information presented, you can telephone us at (800) 223-4291 and we will try our best to help you.

Copyright 1996 - 2003, Robert J. Mintz, All Rights Reserved.

No part of this site or its content may be reproduced in any form or by electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the copyright holder.